World News

Reporters

SRI LANKA: Anger Rises Over Torture Case, But Solution Unclear

Sri LankaCOLOMBO, Sep 2  (IPS)  - The ordeal of a Sri Lankan domestic worker whose Saudi Arabian employer allegedly drove nails and metal wires into her body has sent alarm bells ringing among government officials and activists, but how such abuses can be stopped remain far from clear. "This is a bit of a problem.

Maybe we need to look at some new protective measures," said Mangala Randeniya, deputy general manager at the state-owned Sri Lanka Bureau of Foreign Employment (SLBFE), which looks after the overseas deployment of this South Asian island nation’s workers.   The widely reported case of 50-year-old L P D Ariyawathi, who returned to Sri Lanka on Aug. 21 with 20 nails and metal wires in her body, has triggered protests outside the Saudi Arabian embassy here.    After President Mahinda Rajapaksa ordered a full investigation into the Ariyawathi case, SLBFE officials flew to Riyadh on Aug. 30 to persuade Saudi authorities to take action against the employer and discuss issues facing migrant workers.  

This latest case may be the most bizarre thus far, but it is not the first and will not be last, given that this South Asian island nation has 1.5 million overseas workers, of whom 1.2 million work in Saudi Arabia. Majority of them are women working in private homes as domestic workers.  But Lakshan Dias, a lawyer who is chairman of the Colombo- based South Asian Network for Refugees, IDPs and Migrant Workers, says Ariyawathi’s plight provides a opportunity for the Sri Lankan government to step up pressure on labour- receiving countries to fulfill international conventions against torture and others respecting the rights of migrant workers.   Saudi Arabia has signed the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Convention against Torture but with some reservations, he says.   "Putting pressure on governments won’t necessarily mean we will lose markets," he said, arguing that recently the SLBFE banned the deployment of Sri Lankan domestic workers in Jordan because agents there were paying less than the prescribed minimum wage of 200 U.S. dollars per month.  But while Sri Lanka has bilateral agreements on migrant labour with Kuwait and Jordan, it does not have one with Saudi Arabia.  

Likewise, Sri Lanka, like many other labour-exporting countries, has signed the 1990 International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Their Families. But many labour-receiving nations, like Saudi Arabia, have not signed it.   With little certainty over how justice can be obtained in Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka’s bureau of foreign employment has taken the responsibility of compensating Ariyawathi with a house and cash. It says it plans to fly her to Saudi Arabia in case her presence is required for an investigation there.   Nimalka Fernando, a women’s rights activist and spokeswoman for the Colombo-based Women’s Alliance for Peace and Democracy, says the government drags its feet over the protection of domestic workers, which the country has been exporting for three decades.   "Sri Lankan domestic workers are getting harassed almost daily in some part of the world but our officials are slow in responding," she said. "It was horrifying that the Foreign Minister G L Peiris met the Saudi ambassador in Colombo to register a complaint in the Ariyawathi case only on Tuesday (Aug. 31), almost 10 days after the victim returned and the storywas splashed all over the newspapers." 

She said rights groups plan to file a complaint with the U.N. Expert Group on Migrant Workers in Geneva on the torture of Ariyawathi. "We are also canvassing for all labour- receiving countries where Sri Lankans work to ratify the ILO Convention Against Torture and enforce it," she added.   But Dias says that what happens to efforts to seek legal address in Saudi Arabia, where this is first case of abuse of this kind for Sri Lanka, is up in the air. If the courts move and issue a ruling in favour of the migrant worker, it could be precedent case for the future.   He adds that judicial intervention – getting a ruling and policy from the courts – might be more effective than working through existing laws.  

For instance, Dias has filed a fundamental rights petition in Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court on behalf of a Sri Lankan worker who was duped into signing a second contract with a job agent, one where the job designation was changed from the original contract and the salary reduced. This worker returned to Sri Lanka a few months after arriving in Qatar, where he had been forced to work as a labourer although he was a skilled plumber, and then fell ill.  

The victim is demanding not only compensation but a ruling from the court that the government should have a compensation formula for all workers in distress.   Ariyawathi’s case has drawn as much attention as much as what happened to Rizana Nafeek, the underage domestic worker who was trafficked into Saudi Arabia and sentenced to death on Jun. 16, 2007 for the alleged murder of an infant in her care. In jail since May 2005, Nafeek’s sentence has been suspended in view of an appeal.

'Save Us From These Bankers, Fast'

BankBRUSSELS, Jul 5  (IPS)  - Besieged by bankers opposed to regulation of their sector, members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have taken an unusual step. A cross-party alliance has called for an international campaigning organisation to concentrate on
remedying the flaws of the financial services industry with the same tenacity that Amnesty International focuses on victims of torture and Greenpeace on toxic chemicals and whales.

The call -- signed by 70 of the Parliament's 736 elected members -- was prompted by concerns over how the financial lobby had marshalled its ample resources over the past few years in a bid to dilute legislation drafted in response to the global economic crisis. According to the MEPs, the pressure they have been placed under by the financial industry is so intense that it represents a threat to democracy, especially as public interest groups have generally lacked the means or the expertise to mount a robust counter-
offensive to the banks' efforts.

The pressure from the financial industry is unlikely to be eased in the coming months as the European Union's only directly elected body considers a number of crucial dossiers.

First, the Parliament will vote Jul. 7 on proposed new rules on capital
requirements for banks and on how much financial 'whiz-kids' may be paid
in bonuses. Written in response to the immense public anger over how banks
rescued at the taxpayers' expense were maintaining lavish pay-and-perk
deals for their management, the latest draft of the proposal would require
that upfront cash bonuses do not exceed 30 percent of total bonuses. Instead
of doling out bonuses in cash, between 40 percent and 60 percent of all
bonuses would have to be deferred and could be recovered in cases where
investments fare badly.

Arlene McCarthy, British Labour Party member of the European Parliament
(MEP) who has been leading the Parliament's negotiations with EU
governments on the proposal, is among those who have expressed misgivings
about the influence that banks wield over politicians and civil servants. She
has stated that her plan is not designed to punish bankers but rather to
ensure that bonuses they receive are linked to their performance.

The European Banking Federation (EBF), an umbrella group for 5,000 banks, is
claiming that this kind of ceiling on bonuses would prove economically
damaging.

”The European Parliament is promoting rules that are more stringent than
those of our major trading partners and competitors,” Robert Priester, an EBF
representative, told IPS. ”The stricter rules in the EU raise issues of
competitiveness for Europe's banking or financial services sector.”

According to data it made available to an EU register of lobbyists, EBF spent
over a million euros (1.3 million dollars) last year in trying to influence the
Union's institutions. ”Lobbying in the EU is fundamentally different from the
U.S. where donations and contributions are commonplace to exert influence,”
said Priester. ”The European institutions do not work that way and EBF does
not need to make such donations.”

Despite claiming to have a relatively small budget for its activities, the EBF has
been able to ensure it has full access to the Brussels elite. Its secretary-
general Guido Ravoet doubles up as chairman of the European Parliamentary
Financial Services Forum.

Presenting itself as dedicated to spreading ”neutral information”, the forum
nonetheless brings together some of the best-known players in the global
banking industry such as Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan, and
MEPs sympathetic to them. Some MEPs -- including McCarthy -- who have
warned about the power of the financial lobby are also active in the forum.

In February, the forum published a briefing paper, exhorting MEPs to radically
reshape a proposed EU directive regulating hedge funds. Originally this
directive had been slated for a vote in the Parliament in July but the decision
has been postponed for another few months, while the main EU institutions
continue to deliberate over its contents.

The hedge fund industry -- financial speculators largely based in the City of
London -- has literally been seeking to write the rules it should play by itself.
In April, the Parliament's main committee for economic affairs voted on its
response to the proposed law. MEPs had to wade through 1,600 suggested
amendments to the law on that occasion. Although only MEPs themselves can
sign amendments, it is common practice for industry lobbyists to act as
”ghost-writers”. More than half of the amendments in this case were written
by the financial services industry, according to Parliament insiders.

Whereas hedge funds have been widely accused of engaging in highly risky
practices that helped trigger the global financial crisis, their supporters have
been portraying them as economically beneficial. Open Europe, a corporate-
funded ”think-tank” in London, has published several pamphlets arguing that
hedge funds and private equity bring billions of pounds in tax revenue to the
British economy each year, while not addressing evidence compiled by the Tax
Justice Network and anti-poverty advocates of how hedge funds can be
vehicles for tax evasion.

A hedge fund lobbyist, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said it is
”absurd” to argue that financial services endanger democracy. ”Before now,
we were criticised for not engaging - in inverted commas - with policy-
makers,” he said. ”Now that we have engaged, the perception is we have
engaged too much. The truth of the matter is that many MEPs are so ignorant
of how financial services work that there is an absolute need to have the
relevant industries offering their views. Otherwise, the consequence would be
dreadful legislation.”

Olivier Hoedeman from Corporate Europe Observatory, a lobbying watchdog,
says that the financial services representatives have ”no reason to complain
whatsoever” about belated efforts to regulate their sector.

”The banking lobby in Europe has been very successful so far in postponing
and avoiding any serious new regulation,” he said. ”The EU is far behind the
U.S. We have a very ironic situation, where there have been more positive
changes and tougher regulations passed so far in the U.S. The EU has left
things up in the air.”

MIDEAST: Peace May Rest on the Future of 88 Houses

Middle EastSILWAN, Occupied East Jerusalem, Jul 5  (IPS)  - Frequent clashes and continuing tension in disputed East Jerusalem couldnportend a major outbreak of civil unrest, residents fear. Confrontations follow Israel's acceleration of plans to demolish dozens of Palestinian homes. This could leave over a thousand Palestinians homeless.

Furthermore, Israel is continuing to strip hundreds of East Jerusalemites of their residency. Four members of the Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) from Jerusalem have been ordered to leave the country.

Silwan has become a pivotal point of friction, in the boiling cauldron that East
Jerusalem is fast becoming. This follows Jerusalem municipality's approval of
the pending demolition of 22 Palestinian homes -- with another 66 on the
waiting list -- to make way for a Jewish theme park and an extension of
Jewish neighbourhoods, all illegal under international law.

The Jerusalem municipality argues that the Palestinian homes were built
without building permits. But Palestinians face an almost impossible
bureaucratic battle to obtain permits, despite a chronic housing shortage.

Simultaneously the Israeli authorities actively facilitate Jewish settlement in
East Jerusalem even though this is in violation of UN resolutions.

The Jerusalem District Planning and Building Committee will shortly publish a
new blueprint for the expansion of Jewish neighbourhoods in East Jerusalem,
most of them on privately owned Palestinian land.

”They can bring the bulldozers over my family's bodies,” Fakhri Abu Diab, an
accountant  and spokesman from the Bustan Committee trying to fight
demolitions tells IPS. ”We will not leave our homes. I would rather die than see
my children homeless. I'm not prepared to live in a tent that gets continually
pulled down.

”The demolition of the homes will leave about 1,500 Palestinians with
nowhere to go. Sixty-two percent of the homeless will be children,” adds Abu
Diab, father of five, and one of the residents whose house is due to be
demolished.

Residents of Silwan's Bustan area have tried to meet Jerusalem's municipality
halfway. They have hired architects at great expense to come up with an
alternative plan that would incorporate green areas into Silwan, and also save
the residents' homes.

”The plans were rejected out of hand because they didn't fit in with the
municipality's plans to Judaise the neighbourhood,” says Abu Diab.

The Jerusalem municipality has been adamant about destroying Palestinian
homes and evicting Palestinians from Silwan, but it has not shown the same
determination over settlers ordered by the Israeli courts to vacate the vicinity.

In 2008 the Israeli Supreme Court ordered a group of settlers to vacate the
apartment building Beit Yonatan (named after convicted U.S. spy Jonathan
Pollard who was jailed in 1987 for passing classified information on the U.S.
to Israel) located in the middle of Silwan. Jerusalem's right-wing mayor Nir
Barkat has refused to seal Beit Yonatan or expel the illegal Jewish settlers.

Instead, the residents of Beit Yonatan plan to hire private security guards to evict a number of Palestinian families living in an old Yemenite synagogue in the area.

Another major point of friction is the expulsion orders on four Jerusalem-
based Hamas members of the PLC after they were recently released from
Israeli prisons. They were jailed in a retaliatory move after Hamas fighters in
Gaza captured an Israeli soldier in 2006.

Three of the four PLC members have barricaded themselves in the Red Cross
headquarters in Jerusalem after they were ordered to leave Israel by this week.
They have said they will not leave the office until there is a political or
diplomatic resolution to the crisis.

A fourth member is under arrest for failing to leave the country several weeks
ago. They are being supported by various Palestinian factions, including the
Palestinian Authority (PA) in a rare display of solidarity with Hamas.

PA president Mahmoud Abbas recently hosted the PLC members at his
Ramallah office. The leaders of Jerusalem's Christian congregations are also
supporting the PLC members.

Meanwhile, hundreds more East Jerusalemites continue to live in fear of losing
their Jerusalem residency as Israeli authorities strip Palestinian residents who
have lived or studied abroad for more than seven years of their residency.

The Israeli authorities have also warned that Palestinians joining
demonstrations may be stripped of their
residency.

Business Websites

Business Website Experts

Expedia.com.au - Global Hotel Sale